SHARE:
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

The case is Williamson v. Lowe’s, decided on 2/24/15 by Judge Susan Oki Mollway of the District Court of Hawaii [2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13170].  The case was decided under Hawaii State Law (Section 378-2 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes). 

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

The case is EEOC v. Allstate, decided by the 3rd Circuit on 2/13/15 [2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2330].  Historically, Allstate agents worked through Sears and/or company owned offices via employment contract.  Subsequently, in one reorganization, new

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

As other blogs have noted, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the long-awaited revisions to the Sex Discrimination Guidelines (RIN 1250-AA05) included some very interesting ideas. Some of those relate to the role of performance measurement

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

OFCCP’s notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) addressing Discrimination on the Basis of Sex is lacking clarity on several points and seems to contradict itself as well. This blog post focuses on the proposed changes to part 60-20.2 General

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

As proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the Sex Discrimination Guidelines, sections 60-20.2(b)(7) and 60-20.2(b)(8) of the revised regulations  will seem to limit the federal contractor’s ability to recruit and engage

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Proposed section 60-20.4 “Discriminatory Compensation” in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the Sex Discrimination Guidelines addresses the OFCCP’s enforcement of the prohibition of compensation discrimination as dictated by E.O.

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

In the wake of the new scheduling letter (released in October 2014) and the ensuing OFCCP audit activity, contractors are taking steps to prepare for possible audits. The contractor community has raised a number of questions and concerns in response

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

DCI has noted a recent trend among some compliance officers that are alleging that a 1:1 applicant to hire ratio is a “per se” violation of the regulations.   If this was true, virtually all contractors would be in violation of the

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin