Header Image

EEO Case Law

SHARE:
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

In researching Judge Gorsuch’s record, I found 13 relevant employment discrimination cases[1].  By my count, 9 were favorable to employers and four were fully or partially favorable to employees.  Sizing up a potential justice is, of course,

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Mandatory agreement to binding arbitration of employment disputes as a condition of employment was upheld under the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 (FAA) in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation (1991) [500 U.S. 20] in a case in which two

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

This case, decided on 12/28/16 by the 1st Circuit Court, was (at least to me) at first blush, uninspiring. After reading the case, I believe it has the likelihood of setting a very important precedent regarding the third phase (or prong) in adverse

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

This is the first of two Alerts.  Part I below discusses EEOC v. Scott Medical Health Center [2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153744], decided on November 4, 2016 by Judge Cathy Bisoon of the Western District of Pennsylvania.  The Scott ruling is summarized

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

The case is Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds [2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18074] decided on October 5, 2016 in an 8 to 3 en banc ruling by the 11th Circuit.  At issue was an advertisement by the defendant for recent college graduates.  Richard Villarreal, the

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

In Camp v. Bi-Lo, decided October 21, 2016 [2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19053] by the 6th Circuit, Kenneth Camp worked for Bi-Lo as a grocery stocker for 38 years even though he had a bad back (due to scoliosis) the entire time.  He worked the night shift

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

In a recent Alert, I discussed the OFCCP’s filing of a law suit with the Office of ALJs against Palo Alto company Palantir, a technology company.  The claim is that Palantir discriminated systematically against Asian job applicants in hiring in

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

The case is Dougboh v. Cisco Systems, Inc. decided on 10/24/16 by Judge William J. Martini of the District Court of New Jersey.  The ruling may be read here.

The facts of the case are that Pascal Doughboh applied online for hundreds of jobs at

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

A September 26th OFCCP News Release indicated that OFCCP is suing Palantir Technologies for systemic discrimination against Asian job applicants in three job titles: Quality Assurance Engineer, Software Engineer, and Quality Assurance Engineer

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

On 9/21/16 the OFCCP filed suit with the Office of ALJs against Palo Alto Palantir, a technology company. The claim is that Palantir discriminated systematically against Asian job applicants in hiring in comparison to Non-Asian applicants for three

CONTINUE READING
SHARE
Facebook Twitter Linkedin